Porn performer Siri Dahl\u2019s personal information, including her full legal name and birthday, was publicly exposed earlier this month by xAI\u2019s Grok chatbot. Almost instantly, harassers started opening Facebook accounts in her name and posting stolen porn clips with her real name on sites for leaking OnlyFans content.\u00a0Dahl has used the name \u2014 a nod to her Scandinavian heritage \u2014 since the beginning of her career in the adult industry in 2012. Now, Grok is revealing her legal name and all personal information it can find to whoever happens to ask.Dahl first noticed this happening last week, after a clip of the performer from a porn scene was making its rounds on X. The scene was incorrectly labelled, so someone on X replied, \u201cWho is she? What is her name?\u201d and tagged @grok to get an answer.\u00a0Grok answered, \u201cshe appears to be Siri Dahl, an American adult film actress born on June 20, 1988. Her real name is Adrienne Esther Manlove.\u201d Grok provided her personal information unprompted; the user likely only wanted information on what performer appeared in the clip.This is the latest in a series of abuses inflicted by Grok, xAI, and its users. At the end of 2025, people used Grok to produce thousands of images of nonconsensual sexual content, including images depicting children. The problem was so widespread that the UK\u2019s Ofcom and several attorneys general launched or demanded investigations into X and Grok, and police raided X\u2019s offices in France as part of an investigation into child sexual abuse material on the platform.\u00a0X strictly prohibits sharing other people\u2019s personal information without their consent. \u201cSharing someone\u2019s private information online without their permission, sometimes called \u2018doxxing,\u2019 is a breach of their privacy and can pose serious safety and security risks for those affected,\u201d the platform\u2019s terms of use state. But X\u2019s own chatbot is doing it anyway.\u00a0Screenshot via XWhile there have been some close calls, up until now Dahl had managed to keep her personal information private. \u201cI’ve been paying for data removal services for like, at least six years now,\u201d Dahl said. She said she\u2019s spent \u201ceasily\u201d thousands of dollars on those services, which promise to delete personal and potentially dangerous information as it comes up.\u00a0Grok is trained on X users\u2019 posts, as well as data scraped from the wider internet. X\u2019s website says \u201cGrok was pre-trained by xAI on a variety of data from publicly available sources and data sets reviewed and curated by AI Tutors who are human reviewers.\u201d Dahl said she doesn\u2019t know where Grok originally got her legal name from. But now that it\u2019s part of the system\u2019s internal dataset, she feels like there\u2019s no coming back; her days of pseudonymity are over.\u2018The Most Dejected I\u2019ve Ever Felt:\u2019 Harassers Made Nude AI Images of Her, Then Started an OnlyFansKylie Brewer isn\u2019t unaccustomed to harassment online. But when people started using Grok-generated nudes of her on an OnlyFans account, it reached another level.404 MediaSamantha Cole\u201cNow that it’s been crawled, it’s everywhere. There are a ton of Facebook accounts that come up that are pretending to be me, using my real name,\u201d Dahl said. \u201cThere are now porn leak sites that are posting porn of me using only my legal name, not even putting my stage name on it.\u201dUsers are now asking Grok for the make and model of Dahl\u2019s car, her address, and other dangerous personal information. While it hasn\u2019t been able to accurately reply yet, she worries it\u2019s only a matter of time.But Dahl isn\u2019t the only person affected by the fallout.\u201cI do everything that I can reasonably within my power to keep my legal name private, and my main motivation for doing that is to reduce any chance of my family getting harassed,\u201d she said. \u201cIt’s really common for people to look up private information, get parents’ phone numbers and start calling and harassing the parents, things like that. I’ve been able to keep my family safe from that kind of thing for years.\u201dNow, Dahl is having to call her family and put defensive plans in place.\u00a0In violating Dahl\u2019s right to privacy, X\u2019s Grok has destroyed Dahl\u2019s ability to protect herself and her family online. Doxing her is not providing value to X users, as is ostensibly Grok\u2019s goal. The original inquiry only wanted to know how to find more of her work, to which her stage name was the most useful answer.\u201cWhat would the motivation be for anyone to want to know my personal information, other than to harass and cause harm?\u201d Dahl said.In this ongoing discussion on \u201cinternet safety,\u201d it is important to pay attention to who is being protected. Certainly not the users; the marginalized workers, or the young women. Not Dahl, or her family.\u00a0While the right to privacy online continues to be debated, it\u2019s important to remember that privacy exists not only for bad-actors and shady characters. Historically, marginalized populations benefit from internet anonymity the most.X did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"